jagy
Herb Derpington III.
Anmeldungsdatum: 26.11.2006
Beiträge: 7275
|
 (#753003) Verfasst am: 22.06.2007, 19:01 Titel: Geniale Antwort an Schwurbel-Theologen... |
 |
|
Geniale Antwort von PZ Myers an Schwurbel-Theologen und Leuten, die Dawkins (und anderen) vorwerfen, nur "das schlechteste" der Relgion/Theologie zu kritisieren und vor allem nicht auf die Werke sogenannter "moderner" Schwurbel-Theologen einzugehen.
Der Artikel ist schon etwas älter, mir ist er nur eingefallen, weil Dawkins in in einem aktuellen Video auf seiner Seite zitiert (er liest ein neues Vorwort aus der Hardcover-GodDelusion Version vor).
Geschichte ist ein Theologe, der Dawkins vorwirft, dass er brutal und einfach dem Kaiser Nacktheit vorwirft (wer die Geschichte nicht kennt: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Des_Kaisers_neue_Kleider)
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2006/12/the_courtiers_reply.php
| Zitat: | I have considered the impudent accusations of Mr Dawkins with exasperation at his lack of serious scholarship. He has apparently not read the detailed discourses of Count Roderigo of Seville on the exquisite and exotic leathers of the Emperor's boots, nor does he give a moment's consideration to Bellini's masterwork, On the Luminescence of the Emperor's Feathered Hat. We have entire schools dedicated to writing learned treatises on the beauty of the Emperor's raiment, and every major newspaper runs a section dedicated to imperial fashion; Dawkins cavalierly dismisses them all. He even laughs at the highly popular and most persuasive arguments of his fellow countryman, Lord D. T. Mawkscribbler, who famously pointed out that the Emperor would not wear common cotton, nor uncomfortable polyester, but must, I say must, wear undergarments of the finest silk.
Dawkins arrogantly ignores all these deep philosophical ponderings to crudely accuse the Emperor of nudity.
Personally, I suspect that perhaps the Emperor might not be fully clothed — how else to explain the apparent sloth of the staff at the palace laundry — but, well, everyone else does seem to go on about his clothes, and this Dawkins fellow is such a rude upstart who lacks the wit of my elegant circumlocutions, that, while unable to deal with the substance of his accusations, I should at least chide him for his very bad form.
Until Dawkins has trained in the shops of Paris and Milan, until he has learned to tell the difference between a ruffled flounce and a puffy pantaloon, we should all pretend he has not spoken out against the Emperor's taste. His training in biology may give him the ability to recognize dangling genitalia when he sees it, but it has not taught him the proper appreciation of Imaginary Fabrics. |
Aufjedenfall genial lustig und mit einem größeren Kern Wahrheit
_________________
INGLIP HAS BEEN SUMMONED - IT HAS BEGUN!
|
|
FAQ 
Suchen 
Mitgliederliste 
Nutzungsbedingungen 
Benutzergruppen 
Links
Registrieren
Profil 
Einloggen, um private Nachrichten zu lesen 
Login 
