Philosophen - der Anfang allen Übels.

[Tarvoc]

[Komodo]

[VT_340]

Wenn du das so siehst ist allerdings der Verzehr von Fleisch die Quelle allen Übels, da erst dadruch das Gerhin der Menschen leistungsstark genug werden konnte.
_________________
Denken schadet der Illusion
Hildegard Knef

[Yogosh]

[DeHerg]

[Evilbert]

[Wolf]

[alae]

[Evilbert]

[Tarvoc]

[zelig]

Vermutlich würde kein Mensch freiwillig das Pleistozän wählen, wenn er auch in der Gegenwart leben könnte.
_________________
Es gibt kein richtiges Leben im falschen.

[Tarvoc]

[zelig]

[Evilbert]

[Tarvoc]

Vielleicht nochmal was Interessantes zum Threadthema, ein Zitat aus einer Vorlesung von Slavoj Zizek.

[The] gap between what we consciously know and what we subconsciously believe tells us, I claim, a lot about our predicament, namely how we relate usually to the prospect of ecological catastrophe. This is a paradox. Basically we know. Catastrophe is coming, there will be global warming, whatever. But why don't we act? Why don't we do something? I don't think it's enough [to bring up] this simple leftist explanation [of] big companies, manipulation, whatever. I claim [that] we know but we don't believe. That is to say: Imagine yourself reading a report on global warming [...]. But then, you go out, you see: Sun, trees, grass. "My God", you say, "this cannot really disappear." That's the tragedy, that what prevents us from taking seriously the prospect of ecological catastrophe is directly our emersion into our life world. These beliefs are part of the way we act in reality and it's extremely difficult to renounce them. There is a very important theoretical consequence to be drawn from this. A paradoxical one.

You know the usual criticism of [...] why we are in ecological deadlock. The idea is the following one: "We trust too much [into] science, [into] abstract, scientific reasoning. We should not forget that science is secondary. It's [an] alienated, secondary product of our primordial attitude, which is being embedded in a concrete life world. You see, you feel, you sense with the earth where you live", and so on. But I claim that that's not enough. We cannot return to this immediate life-world experience because this exactly is the problem. If we want to confront ecological catastrophe, we have to precisely outgo this direct embeddedness. Now, let's go on. [...] Namely [...] how do we detect this gap in our beliefs or knowledge, this inconsistency: "I know it's true but nonetheless I don't believe it."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UC0Kp7zmnuA ab 2:27
_________________
"Die Tradition der Unterdrückten belehrt uns darüber, daß der Ausnahmezustands in dem wir leben, die Regel ist."
- Walter Benjamin, VIII. These zum Begriff der Geschichte

[Tarvoc]

[Evilbert]

[Tarvoc]

[Evilbert]

[Tarvoc]

[Evilbert]

[Tarvoc]

[kamelpeitsche]

Ein Sozialdarwinist ist mW nur jemand, der der Überzeugung ist, dass die stärksten, reichsten, klügsten etc. Menschen die Bestimmer sind.
Diese Überzeugung gibt es wohl wesentlich länger als den Darwinismus.
Der Begriff "Sozialdarwinismus" ist doch ohnehin kein wissenschaftlicher oder genuin philosophischer sondern eher eine ziemlich küstliche Metapher.
_________________
"Was immer jeder Einzelne mitbringen will an Prägung oder Anderssein - einem kollektiven Imperativ enzieht es sich mit Sicherheit"

[Tarvoc]

[Evilbert]

[kamelpeitsche]

[Tarvoc]

[Spartacus Leto]

[Tarvoc]

[Evilbert]